Why is it when George W. Bush reads 95 books in 2008 he's wasting time or not using his time well while when Obama reads he is considered erudite and literary?On the NYT Paper Cuts blog, Jennifer Schuessler suggests that it is "truly alarming" that Bush read 95 books (in his competition with Rove.) In a July Salon article, Laura Miller proclaims Obama to be "one of the most literary presidents in recent memory."
*Sighs.*
Unbiased media, my foot.
2 comments:
Goes for workouts too: http://michellemalkin.com/2008/12/27/tale-of-two-presidential-workout-fanatics/
Yeah, I read that; Bush is "creepy" but Obama is Buff. Go figure.
Post a Comment