Thursday, December 31, 2009

Is It Treason Yet?

The definition of treason:

1. the offense of acting to overthrow one's government ...
2. a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.

Bill Roggio reports:

The British are all smiles over the release of Peter Moore, a British citizen who was held hostage by an Iranian-backed Shia terror group in Iraq. But there is little talk about the price paid to secure Moore's release. The US military has freed Qais Qazali, the leader of the Asaib al Haq, or League of the Righteous, as well as his brother Laith, several Qods Force officers, and more than 100 members of the terror group, in exchange for Moore. And that isn't all. The British also received the corpses of three security contractors who were working to protect Moore when he was kidnapped at the Finance Ministry in Baghdad in May 2007. The three contractors were executed by the Asaib al Haq; another is also thought to have been killed.

Qais Qazli wasn't just some run of the mill Shia thug; his group is backed by Iran. Qazali's men were trained by Iranian Qods Force to infiltrate and assault the Provincial Joint Coordination Center in Karbala in January 2007. Five US soldiers were killed during the kidnapping attempt. The US soldiers were executed after US and Iraqi security forces closed in on the assault team.

I can't put it any better than Allahpundit who calls this move "mind-bendingly insane." Words fail me. And that doesn't happen often.

Andy McCarthy quotes Bill Roggio who says:

As Bill elaborated in the Long War Journal: “We let a very dangerous man go, a man whose hands are stained with US and Iraqi blood,” a military officer said. “We are going to pay for this in the future.”

It is just astonishing.

Is it treason yet?

(More at Memeorandum)

Related Post: Assault on Reason - Team Obama Negotiates With Terrorists

Further reading:
Negotiating With Terrorists - Andrew McCarthy, National Review Online, 24 June 2009
Obama's Third Way: Release the Teorrists - Andrew McCarthy, National Review Online, 3 March 2009
Clear and Present Danger - Thomas Joscelyn, The Weekly Standard, 1 December 2008
US Releases Iranian Oods Force Agents - Bill Roggio, The Long War Journal, 9 July 2009
The (Free) Irbil Five: Meeting Iran's Preconditions - Steve Schippert, National Review Online/The Tank, 9 July 2009
Growing Worries About our Pied Piper - Victor Davis Hanson, National Review Online, 10 July 2009


G.R. said...

What is it about terrorism that liberals refuse to understand?
Why can't they get it out of their thinking that if we are nice to those who are wanting to kill us, that those who are wanting to kill us STILL WANT TO KILL US.
This morning I was halfway listening to a segment on a FOX news program about the radicalization of Muslims in London and why it is happening, and why did Britain turn a blind eye to such acts.
The response from the guest should be a wake up call to all weak kneed liberals. The guest said Britain turned a blind eye to the radical Muslims, because they felt that if they didn't bother the radical Muslims, the radical Muslims would leave them alone.
Yes, that approach really worked. Didn't it?
Unfortunately, the hungry wolf has already made it through the door.

Anonymous said...

I sure hope Roxana Saberi was worth it.