Add "Babe" to Your List of Derogatory Extremist Slurs

I mentioned the other day that political correctness has run amok and I stand by that statement.  When (and why) in the world did we all become so sensitive?  Even our speech is now controlled by the nanny-state.

Case in point:  Professor Jacobson at Legal Insurrection links to this story by Adam Clark Estes in The Atlantic.  Remember him?  Estes is the fellow who mocked the death of a Cornell student who died from H1N1 in 2009.

As Professor Jacobson points out today, in that 2009 article Estes made an error in judgment with his mockery.  "It happens."  Indeed it does.

In the eyes of Mr. Estes, however, it seems to be a case of "do as I say and not as I do."  Estes is all over Rush Limbaugh for referring to writer Tracie McMillan a "babe" and an "authorette."

Limbaugh's thesis (one Estes seems to have missed), was that there is no "war on women" as the left claims there is.  To illustrate that point he highlights Ms. McMillan's book, The American Way of Eating.  Limbaugh doesn't really say anything derogatory about McMillan personally; he called her forthright, pointed out her credentials and that "she knows her way around a kitchen."  Is that an insult these days?  I wouldn't think so.  Maybe it is to Mr. Estes.

Estes loses sight of the fact that Limbaugh's main point was that there isn't a war on women, but "a war on freedom," which is being waged by the left.  That "war" extends right down to the food you eat.  I haven't read Ms. McMillan's book but she seems to be making the case that good food is the domain of the affluent.

Estes also finds fault with the fact that Rush points out Ms. McMillan is "a white woman."  I'm not sure when that became derogatory, either.

It is this excerpt from Rush's commentary that seems to irk Mr. Estes:

What is it with all of these young single white women, overeducated -- doesn't mean intelligent.  For example, Tracie McMillan, the author of this book, seems to be just out of college and already she has been showered with awards, including the 2006 James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism.  Social justice journalism.  This woman who wrote the book on food inequality, food justice, got an award for social justice journalism.  She won a national prize rewarding journalism that measures business, governmental and social affairs against clear ideals of the common good.  Her degree is not in food or nutrition.  She has a B.A. from New York University in political science.  She's a political scientist.  She's a journalist.  She has received awards for social justice journalism, and she has a book out on food justice.

Is that derogatory?  Mr. Estes has trouble deciphering it:

It's hard to comprehend exactly what Limbaugh is try to say. He suggests that McMillan is overeducated but not intelligent, naive and out of her league. McMillan isn't offended, necessarily. She seemed more concerned with the rhetoric Limbaugh's promoting. "Calling me out for being a single woman and suggesting that having put me through university on my own dime makes me an over educated person," she said, "that's pulling out some really bad tendencies in American thinking."

It all seems like a manufactured crisis to me.  It doesn't even sound as if Ms. McMillan is as upset about the language as Mr. Estes is.

As for the Democrats, well, they're using Rush's language as a fund raising opportunity.  Sen. Claire McCaskill, candidate Tarryl Clark, and  Rep. Janice Hahn have all used the Fluke kerfuffle as a money making opportunity:

Sen. Claire McCaskill was so disturbed by Rush Limbaugh’s description of a law school student as a “slut” and “prostitute” that she decided to repeat his rhetoric, featuring it in a fund raising appeal sent to thousands of supporters around the country. The tactic has paid off nicely for the Democrat’s re-election campaign.

I guess it's all a matter of perspective.

Back to political correctness...apparently these days you can't call a girl a "babe," point out that she's white, black, Asian or Martian;  "authorette" is apparently derogatory as well.  I suppose "anchor babe" is, too.

If you want to get into derogatory slurs, it seems to come more from the left as from the right.  A leftist called me "pathetic" on my own blog just this week.  Derogatory?  Well, I wish she'd called me a "babe" instead.

Mr. Estes needs to put his copy of Rule of Radicals back on the shelf and stop making a crisis where there is none.

Editor of HuffPo's Health Unit Mocks Death of Cornell Student

Friday, September 11, 2009, a 20 year old student at Cornell University, Warren Schor, pictured left, died of complications from the swine flu. IvyGate Blog chose the tragedy as an occasion for mockery and silliness.

IvyGate is a blog that purports itself to be a "news and gossip blog that covers the Ivy League" and is written by current and former students. In the past they've covered stories such as the Princeton class president who set a squirrel on fire and more recently, mocking the distribution at Harvard of a pamphlet instructing students not to defecate in the shower.

When Warren Schor died last week, IvyGate published this article, originally under the byline of Molly Fitzpatrick, now under the byline of Adam Clark Estes. The article mocks Schor's death and the administration attempts to encourage students to stay healthy by practicing good hygiene. So intent was IvyGate on its mission of mockery that they couldn't even get the dead student's name right in the original article, first identifying him as "William" Schor, until offended commenters called out the error.

The comments following the article are unanimously offended by the post; one even points out the mysterious change in authorship: "You change the name of the author of the post but yet you keep the disrespectful and inconsiderate tone of it. At the very least get rid of that tasteless photo. Ivy Gate Media should be ashamed. Shame on you."

So why the change of byline? Was Fitzpatrick embarrassed and having second thoughts about her poor taste? Was she pressed to pull the article? Why did blog editor Adam Clark Estes take ownership of the post?

In addition to his responsibilities as editor of IvyGate, Estes is also Associate Editor of Huffington Post Investigative Fund, described by Arianna Huffington this way: "This nonprofit Fund will produce a wide-range of investigative journalism created by both staff reporters and freelance writers." The site considers itself a "watchdog" of sorts, reporting on fraud, abuse, and waste in government.

In June, Estes announced the formation of the Investigative Fund's Health Unit whose purpose is to track the progress of ObamaCare. So why is a Huffington Post editor and one in charge of the Health Unit, mocking the death of a young man with H1N1?

Following the death of Schor, Cornell University officials suspended most social activities for a week in an attempt to quell the H1N1 outbreak on campus and protect the students, a move which Estes saw fit to poke fun of: "[The] Inter-Fraternity Council had instated a weeklong [sic] moratorium on social events to help prevent the spread of the disease. But, due to a flood of flu-related visits, Gannett also has stopped scheduling routine appointments, so they may just be canceling frat parties to avoid the standard Sunday morning rush for Plan B. After the jump—a lesson in hygiene and how your Atari will kill you. "

Estes (or Fitzpatrick) then wrote, in response to administration officials asking students to wash their hands, "you should never take it for granted that a frat house will have soap."

And if the mocking tone and the botched initial identification of Schor were not enough, IvyGate saw fit to illustrate the piece with a photo of a pig and the word "Crap!" over it. Tasteless.

It is unfortunate that Estes and Fitzpatrick, and I'm assigning responsibility to both, chose to mock the death of Warren Schor. The young man has a family that is grieving and a close network of friends. As editor of IvyGate, Estes assumes the responsibility for this post whether he wrote it or not; the change of byline was probably unnecessary.

IvyGate has reached a new low in insensitivity and should respond to the requests of its readers, as well as a common sense of decency, apologize to the family, and pull the post.

Update: Linked by The Daley Gator! And Carol's Closet! Also Backyard Conservative, thanks! Also Legal Insurrection! Welcome Michelle Malkin readers!

Update 2: Now a Memeorandum thread.

Update 3: This morning, IvyGate posted an update to their story. They took down the picture of the pig and replaced it with a "more somber picture" and modified some of the language. I'll let you decide if you think it's an apology of if one is needed:

UPDATE: Some have questioned whether it's appropriate to have jokes in the same post that acknowledges a death. No element of this post mocks the deceased or those grieving—in fact, any humor is directed at the administration and their lack of response that precluded the student's death. However, since we wrote most the post before the death, then updated it afterwards, the tone may now be off. It's our policy never to take down posts, but as a concession we've added a more somber picture and adjusted some language.

From the comments following the post, it's not enough for some.